![]() ![]() Sort all files by ARTIST or whatever sort criteria you want. Then additonally load the other set of media files. A second instance is not really necessary. So, in short: working with mp3tag would become very tiring, I guess, as you keep waiting for the synchronization.īut as DetlevD described one alternative, I would like to add that the main approach is:Īll those conditions that you have described can be expressed with filter expressions. As you would probably load one instance with the whole collection and the other instance only with a subset, it would always be the window with the huge amount of data that needs reloading. You would have to do every action twice: once you have modified something in one instance, the other one would have to reload the data and/or update the loaded data. ![]() Īnd this especially with larger collections. So you can see that if I could open a second instance of Mp3tag, I could just switch between windows. It would be still a manual job with a possibility of making errors, but it would be much more efficient and safer that my current possibilities It would be still a drag but a much less of a drag than my current oneĪlternatively: if I could highlight a set of files with a given characteristic, then I could load the old and the new songs and just simply scroll throughout the whole list and see which files should be dealt with. I have this problem, that I will simplify and describe in points:ġ] Some of the old songs have LYRICIST tag with names written down in themģ] I do not remember what old song have a lyricistĤ] I do not remember if a new song is some other version of an old song or a completely new songĥ] So: I have to check every single new song and compare it with already existing old songs ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |